Suspect data for all FLORT variables.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

Suspect data for all FLORT variables - this should be investigated and annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

Suspect data for all FLORT variables - this should be investigated and annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

Suspect data for all FLORT variables - this should be investigated and annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

Suspect data for all FLORT variables - this should be investigated and annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

Suspect data >80 dbar for most deployments.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

For all deployments, a substantial portion of data are outside of global ranges, the majority of which are negative (up to -2).

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

The majority of data are outside of global ranges for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

Annotation ID 1402 needs to be updated when the algorithm is fixed.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

According to annotation ID 397, recovered data are missing. These data should be ingested or the annotation should be updated to indicate why the recovered data aren't available.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

According to annotation ID 400, recovered data are missing. These data should be ingested or the annotation should be updated to indicate why the recovered data aren't available.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

According to annotation ID 401, recovered data are missing. These data should be ingested or the annotation should be updated to indicate why the recovered data aren't available.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

According to annotation ID 398, recovered data are missing. These data should be ingested or the annotation should be updated to indicate why the recovered data aren't available.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

Annotation ID 230: Deployment 4: WFP stopped profiling. Excluding from final data ranges.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

76%-79% of beam_attenuation and optical_absorption data for this deployment are nans, fill values, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/- 5 SD).

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

75%-77% of beam_attenuation and optical_absorption data for this deployment are nans, fill values, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/- 5 SD).

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

77%-80% of beam_attenuation and optical_absorption data for this deployment are fill values, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/- 5 SD).

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

According to Roesler and Barnard (Optical proxy for phytoplankton biomass in the absence of photophysiology: Rethinking the absorption line height, Methods in Oceanography, 2013), “absorption meters are highly prone to biofouling, particularly biofilms which not only attenuate the collimated beam but also impact the scattering properties of the optical surfaces and tubes. In productive coastal waters biofouling can have significant impacts (i.e. 10% of the signal) within one to two weeks”.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

The missing data at the end of deployments 1 and 2 (98 and 95 days) should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19

optical_absorption and beam_attenuation are arrays of all fill values. According to the computed_provenance in the provenance.json file, practical salinity and temp are missing from the ctdbp_cdef_dcl_instrument_recovered data stream.

By Lori Garzio, on 6/24/19