bin_depths are incorrect for deployments 1-3. The bin_depth ranges are about 2100 - 2700 m for all three deployments.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/16/19

The .nc files for deployments 1-3 are missing the coordinates pressure, lat and lon.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/16/19

Missing data for deployment 1 should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/16/19

40-55% of seawater velocities for deployments 1-3 are NaNs, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/- 5 SD).

By Lori Garzio, on 12/16/19

bin_depths are incorrect for deployments 1-3. The bin_depth ranges are about 2475 - 2930 m for all three deployments.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/16/19

The .nc files for deployments 1-3 are missing the coordinates pressure, lat and lon.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/16/19

61% of beam attenuation and 84% optical_absorption values for this deployment are NaNs, fill values, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/- 5 SD)

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

Suspect data - lots of noise and negative values

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

Missing data at the end of deployments 2 and 3 should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

There is no pressure variable in the .nc files. This should be a coordinate.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

The .nc files for deployments 1-4 are missing the coordinates pressure, lat and lon.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

According to Roesler and Barnard (Optical proxy for phytoplankton biomass in the absence of photophysiology: Rethinking the absorption line height, Methods in Oceanography, 2013), “absorption meters are highly prone to biofouling, particularly biofilms which not only attenuate the collimated beam but also impact the scattering properties of the optical surfaces and tubes. In productive coastal waters biofouling can have significant impacts (i.e. 10% of the signal) within one to two weeks”.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

45% of optical_absorption values for this deployment are NaNs, fill values, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/- 5 SD)

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

55% of optical_absorption values for this deployment are NaNs, fill values, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/- 5 SD)

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

There is no pressure variable in the .nc files. This should be a coordinate.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

The .nc files for deployments 1-4 are missing the coordinates pressure, lat and lon.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

Missing data at the end of deployments 2 and 3 should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

According to Roesler and Barnard (Optical proxy for phytoplankton biomass in the absence of photophysiology: Rethinking the absorption line height, Methods in Oceanography, 2013), “absorption meters are highly prone to biofouling, particularly biofilms which not only attenuate the collimated beam but also impact the scattering properties of the optical surfaces and tubes. In productive coastal waters biofouling can have significant impacts (i.e. 10% of the signal) within one to two weeks”.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

Global ranges for hpies_bliley_frequency are 4-200, however the description for this variable states "Send alert if not within 200 Hz of 4 MHz". The global ranges should be reviewed.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19

There are no global ranges in the system for hpies_pressure_L1

By Lori Garzio, on 12/13/19