Photosynthetically Available Radiation
- Reference Designator
- GA05MOAS-PG580-06-PARADM000
- Review Status
- Review Complete
- Note
- Depth
- 0 to 200m
- Class
- PARAD (Photosynthetically Available Radiation)
- Make / Model
- Biospherical Instruments / QSP-2155
Dataset Reviews Last processed: 9/4/19, 7:21 PM
| Dep. | Preferred Method | Stream | DD | FD | SG | EG | Gaps | GD | TS | Rate (s) | Pressure Comp. | Time Order | Valid Data | Missing Data | Data Comp. | Missing Coords. | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | recovered_host | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11,072 | 1 | 200 / 205 | 1 | Complete |
Test Notes
- fail: check ['Photosynthetically Active Radiation']
Data Coverage
| Deployment: | 1 |
|---|---|
| 50% |
Deployment Map
System Annotations Show
| Metadata | Start Date | End Date | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GA05MOAS-PG580 |
10/31/16, 9:32 PM | 11/1/16, 6:05 PM |
Deployment 1: Short deployment due to a leak that developed near the NUTNR sensor. Glider was recovered after 4 days. Id: 667 By: lgarzio |
Review Notes
| Metadata | Start Date | End Date | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GA05MOAS |
Glider optodes typically exhibit a sensor lag of 20-25 seconds. Example attached of several segments with consecutive down and up casts for CP05MOAS-GL335-04-DOSTAM000 on 10/26/2015 showing a typical measurement time lag. Profiles should be analyzed for individual time lags and data should be adjusted. OOI doesn't necessarily need to make the adjustment but users should be aware of the issue. By Lori Garzio, on 5/31/19  |
||
|
GA05MOAS-PG580-06-PARADM000 Deployment: 1 |
99% of the sci_bsipar_par values are outside of global ranges. sci_bsipar_par is the unscaled L0 PAR data product. The global ranges for this parameter are the same as for the scaled L1 PAR data product [0.0, 2500.0]. The global range for sci_bsipar_par should be reviewed. By Lori Garzio, on 9/18/19  |
||
|
GA05MOAS-PG580-06-PARADM000 Deployment: 1 |
99% of the parad_m_par values are outside of global ranges. The scaling factor should be reviewed. By Lori Garzio, on 9/18/19  |