Photosynthetically Available Radiation
- Reference Designator
- CP05MOAS-PG564-06-PARADM000
- Start Depth
- 0
- End Depth
- 200
- Location
- Current Status
- Review Complete
- M2M Example
- https://ooinet.oceanobservatories.org/api/m2m/12576/sensor/inv/CP05MOAS/PG564/06-PARADM000/metadata
| Method | Data Stream | Content | Type | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| recovered_host | parad_m_glider_recovered | Data Products | Report M2M Stats | Science |
| telemetered | parad_m_glider_instrument | Data Products | Report M2M Stats | Science |
| Deployment | Cruise | Start Date | Stop Date | Mooring Asset | Node Asset | Sensor Asset | Latitude | Longitude | Deployment Depth | Water Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Review | SI20170418 | 04/20/2017 | 04/20/2017 | CGVCP-05MOAS-00000 | CGVEH-GLDRCP-00564 | CGINS-PARADM-50199 | 40.0277 | -70.4929 | 200 | 200 |
| 2 Review | WJ20170815 | 08/17/2017 | 10/07/2017 | CGVCP-05MOAS-00000 | CGVEH-GLDRCP-00564 | CGINS-PARADM-50199 | 40.0233 | -70.8802 | 200 | 200 |
| Metadata | Start Date | End Date | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CP05MOAS |
Bad altimeter pings are apparent in many deployments of the coastal gliders. A few example plots are attached - m_water_depth plotted as semi-transparent bathymetry. By Lori Garzio, on 5/10/19 |
||
|
CP05MOAS |
Glider optodes typically exhibit a sensor lag of 20-25 seconds. Example attached of several segments with consecutive down and up casts for CP05MOAS-GL335-04-DOSTAM000 on 10/26/2015 showing a typical measurement time lag. Profiles should be analyzed for individual time lags and data should be adjusted. OOI doesn't necessarily need to make the adjustment but users should be aware of the issue. By Lori Garzio, on 5/15/19  |
||
|
CP05MOAS-PG564 |
There are no global ranges in the system for any science parameter from all instruments on this glider. By Lori Garzio, on 5/30/19 |
||
|
CP05MOAS-PG564-06-PARADM000 Deployment: 2 |
parad_m_par values are orders of magnitude too low for this deployment (max value = 0.0011). sci_bsipar_par values are reasonable, so the scaling factor should be reviewed. By Lori Garzio, on 5/30/19  |
No annotations yet.