| Method | Data Stream | Content | Type | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| recovered_host | optaa_dj_dcl_instrument_recovered | Data Products | Report M2M Stats | Science |
| recovered_host | optaa_dj_dcl_metadata_recovered | Metadata | Report M2M | Engineering |
| telemetered | optaa_dj_dcl_instrument | Data Products | Report M2M Stats | Science |
| telemetered | optaa_dj_dcl_metadata | Metadata | Report M2M | Engineering |
| Deployment | Cruise | Start Date | Stop Date | Mooring Asset | Node Asset | Sensor Asset | Latitude | Longitude | Deployment Depth | Water Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Review | AT-26-30 | 03/15/2015 | 11/26/2015 | CGMGA-01SUMO-00001 | CGINS-OPTAAD-00207 | -42.9228 | -42.4393 | 1 | 5161 | |
| 2 Review | NBP-15-10 | 11/14/2015 | 11/08/2016 | CGMGA-01SUMO-00002 | CGINS-OPTAAD-00245 | -42.9246 | -42.5867 | 1 | 5188 | |
| 3 Review | NBP16-09 | 10/27/2016 | 01/14/2018 | CGMGA-01SUMO-00003 | CGINS-OPTAAD-00187 | -42.9204 | -42.4409 | 1 | 5175 |
| Metadata | Start Date | End Date | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GA01SUMO-SBD12-01-OPTAAD000 |
According to Roesler and Barnard (Optical proxy for phytoplankton biomass in the absence of photophysiology: Rethinking the absorption line height, Methods in Oceanography, 2013), “absorption meters are highly prone to biofouling, particularly biofilms which not only attenuate the collimated beam but also impact the scattering properties of the optical surfaces and tubes. In productive coastal waters biofouling can have significant impacts (i.e. 10% of the signal) within one to two weeks”. By Lori Garzio, on 6/27/19 |
| Metadata | Start Date | End Date | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GA01SUMO-SBD12-01-OPTAAD000 Stream: optaa_dj_dcl_instrument |
3/15/15, 5:25 PM |
Per vendor feedback, the first 1-2 min of each AC-S instrument sampling period should be considered suspect. Signal drift can occur as the instrument warms up, flushes with seawater, and the filter wheel spins up. Id: 1795 By: swhite |
|
|
GA01SUMO-SBD12-01-OPTAAD000 Stream: optaa_dj_dcl_instrument_recovered |
3/15/15, 5:25 PM |
Per vendor feedback, the first 1-2 min of each AC-S instrument sampling period should be considered suspect. Signal drift can occur as the instrument warms up, flushes with seawater, and the filter wheel spins up. Id: 1796 By: swhite |
|
|
GA01SUMO |
3/15/15, 5:25 PM | 11/26/15, 5:08 AM |
Deployment 1: Buoy log files showed that seawater was first detected inside the buoy well on 3/26/2015. Both leak detectors showed increasing presence of water over the period of deployment. Upon recovery of the mooring, no external damage was visible and the buoy did not appear to be floating lower than normal. Id: 653 By: lgarzio |
|
GA01SUMO-SBD12 |
3/15/15, 5:25 PM | 11/26/15, 5:08 AM |
Deployment 1: Upon recovery, the bottom of the buoy was heavily biofouled with gooseneck barnacles. The barnacle coverage likely caused imporper sea water flushing at the location of the intakes and sensor faces for the subsurface instruments. Id: 655 By: lgarzio |
|
GA01SUMO-SBD12-01-OPTAAD000 |
3/15/15, 5:25 PM | 11/26/15, 5:08 AM |
Deployment 1: The intake plumbing was torn from the weight of attached barnacles. Id: 657 By: lgarzio |
|
GA01SUMO-SBD12 |
11/14/15, 4:06 PM | 11/8/16, 5:10 AM |
Deployment 2: Upon recovery, the bottom of the buoy was heavily biofouled with barnacles. Id: 664 By: lgarzio |
|
GA01SUMO-SBD12 |
10/26/16, 9:47 PM | 1/14/18, 5:24 AM |
Deployment 3: Upon recovery, the bottom of the buoy was heavily biofouled. Id: 386 By: lgarzio |