Bio-acoustic Sonar (Global)

Reference Designator
GP02HYPM-MPM01-02-ZPLSGA009
Start Depth
150
End Depth
150
Location
Mid-Water Platform
Current Status
Will Not Review
Class
ZPLSG (Bio-acoustic Sonar (Global))
Series
ZPLSG-A
Science Discipline
Biological
Make
ASL Environmental Sciences
Model
AZFP
M2M Example
https://ooinet.oceanobservatories.org/api/m2m/12576/sensor/inv/GP02HYPM/MPM01/02-ZPLSGA009/metadata

No streams found

Deployment Cruise Start Date Stop Date Mooring Asset Node Asset Sensor Asset Latitude Longitude Deployment Depth Water Depth
4 Review RB1605 07/03/2016 07/16/2017 CGMGP-02HYPM-00004 CGINS-ZPLSGA-55093 50.0796 -144.806 150 4220
5 Review SR1710 07/15/2017 07/26/2018 CGMGP-02HYPM-00005 CGINS-ZPLSGA-55110 50.1156 -144.918 150 4230
6 Review SR1811 07/22/2018 09/26/2019 CGMGP-02HYPM-00006 CGINS-ZPLSGA-55093 50.0686 -144.798 150 4222
7 Review SKQ201920S 09/26/2019 CGMGP-02HYPM-00007 CGINS-ZPLSGA-55068 50.1152 -144.916 150 4237
Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
GP02HYPM

I submitted a helpdesk question on 11/12/2018 regarding an offset between recovered and telemetered data for all global HYPMs: "There appears to be a substantial offset between data with the same timestamps from recovered_wfp and telemetered methods for all deployments of all global WFP CTDs, and I have included information from two representative deployments of two different profilers as examples. It looks like the values recorded for the first common timestamp are exactly the same, and as the profiler moves along in time the offset between the values recorded for the same timestamp become increasingly more offset. Then, the profiler reaches the end of the profile (either at its shallowest or deepest point), resets, and the pattern begins again. This is most easily seen in the pressure data, but there is an offset for all science parameters.

Examples:
GI02HYPM-WFP02-04-CTDPFL000 deployment 1
GP02HYPM-WFP02-04-CTDPFL000 deployment 3

The *_intersect.csv files attached contain data where recovered and telemetered timestamps intersect. For each timestamp and science parameter there are recorded values (from .nc files downloaded from the system) and the difference. For each parameter, the difference between the values at the bottom and top of the profiler's range are exactly zero, and (particularly for pressure) the differences steadily increase until they are reset at zero at the bottom/top of the profile. This pattern continues throughout the deployment. The plots attached are zoomed in to one upcast and one downcast, and highlight the offset in the data between the two methods."

Redmine 13743

By Lori Garzio, on 8/8/19

GP02HYPM
7/3/16, 2:05 AM 7/26/18, 10:15 PM

Deployments 4 and 5 don't have deployment depths defined in asset management.

By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

GP02HYPM
Deployment: 2
6/16/14, 2:15 AM 6/22/14, 12:00 PM

Excluding data from the beginning of deployment 2 from the final statistics as the mooring was recovered and re-deployed (annotation ID 580)

By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

GP02HYPM
Deployment: 5
7/15/17, 9:25 PM 7/26/18, 10:15 PM

The mooring was deployed 9 - 10 km from the location of the previous 4 deployments of this mooring. If this location is correct, the platform should be annotated to inform the users as to why the deployment location changed.

By Lori Garzio, on 1/2/19

New Note

Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
GP02HYPM
6/20/14, 11:28 PM 6/21/14, 10:14 PM

Deployment 2: Platform was deployed on 6/16/2014, recovered on 6/21/2014 at 03:28 UTC due to firmware issue and re-deployed with updated firmware on 6/22/2014 at 02:14 UTC

Id: 580 By: lgarzio
Flag: not_operational Exclude: No

GP02HYPM
7/15/17, 5:25 PM 7/26/18, 6:15 PM

Deployment 5: Telemetered data are not available for this deployment because gliders were not deployed.

Id: 140 By: lgarzio