2-Wavelength Fluorometer

Reference Designator
GP02HYPM-WFP02-01-FLORDL000
Start Depth
310
End Depth
2,093
Location
Wire Following Profiler Body
Current Status
Review Complete
Class
FLORD (2-Wavelength Fluorometer)
Series
FLORD-L
Science Discipline
Biological
Make
WET Labs
Model
FLBBRTD
M2M Example
https://ooinet.oceanobservatories.org/api/m2m/12576/sensor/inv/GP02HYPM/WFP02/01-FLORDL000/metadata
Method Data Stream Content Type
recovered_wfp flord_l_wfp_instrument_recovered Data Products Report M2M Stats Science
telemetered flord_l_wfp_instrument Data Products Report M2M Stats Science
Deployment Cruise Start Date Stop Date Mooring Asset Node Asset Sensor Asset Latitude Longitude Deployment Depth Water Depth
1 Review MV1309 07/26/2013 06/14/2014 CGMGP-02HYPM-00001 CGVEH-GWFPGX-93602 CGINS-FLORDL-02736 50.0707 -144.798 2174 4219
2 Review MV1404 06/22/2014 06/02/2015 CGMGP-02HYPM-00002 CGVEH-GWFPGX-93602 CGINS-FLORDL-02736 50.0783 -144.805 2093 4219
3 Review TN323 06/04/2015 07/01/2016 CGMGP-02HYPM-00003 CGVEH-GWFPGX-99701 CGINS-FLORDL-02934 50.0798 -144.803 2102 4219
4 Review RB1605 07/03/2016 07/16/2017 CGMGP-02HYPM-00004 CGVEH-GWFPGX-10402 CGINS-FLORDL-03283 50.0796 -144.806 2094 4220
5 Review SR1710 07/15/2017 07/26/2018 CGMGP-02HYPM-00005 CGVEH-GWFPGX-99701 CGINS-FLORDL-02934 50.1156 -144.918 2095 4230
6 Review SR1811 07/22/2018 09/26/2019 CGMGP-02HYPM-00006 CGVEH-GWFPGX-10402 CGINS-FLORDL-03283 50.0686 -144.798 2095 4222
7 Review SKQ201920S 09/26/2019 CGMGP-02HYPM-00007 CGVEH-GWFPGX-99701 CGINS-FLORDL-02934 50.1152 -144.916 2095 4237
Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
GP02HYPM-WFP02

Deployment 1: profiler stopped ascending to the minimum depth in the second half of the deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 8/7/19

GP02HYPM-WFP02-01-FLORDL000

Unreasonably high chl-a and backscatter outliers are scattered throughout all deployments.

By Lori Garzio, on 8/7/19

GP02HYPM

I submitted a helpdesk question on 11/12/2018 regarding an offset between recovered and telemetered data for all global HYPMs: "There appears to be a substantial offset between data with the same timestamps from recovered_wfp and telemetered methods for all deployments of all global WFP CTDs, and I have included information from two representative deployments of two different profilers as examples. It looks like the values recorded for the first common timestamp are exactly the same, and as the profiler moves along in time the offset between the values recorded for the same timestamp become increasingly more offset. Then, the profiler reaches the end of the profile (either at its shallowest or deepest point), resets, and the pattern begins again. This is most easily seen in the pressure data, but there is an offset for all science parameters.

Examples:
GI02HYPM-WFP02-04-CTDPFL000 deployment 1
GP02HYPM-WFP02-04-CTDPFL000 deployment 3

The *_intersect.csv files attached contain data where recovered and telemetered timestamps intersect. For each timestamp and science parameter there are recorded values (from .nc files downloaded from the system) and the difference. For each parameter, the difference between the values at the bottom and top of the profiler's range are exactly zero, and (particularly for pressure) the differences steadily increase until they are reset at zero at the bottom/top of the profile. This pattern continues throughout the deployment. The plots attached are zoomed in to one upcast and one downcast, and highlight the offset in the data between the two methods."

Redmine 13743

By Lori Garzio, on 8/8/19

GP02HYPM
7/3/16, 2:05 AM 7/26/18, 10:15 PM

Deployments 4 and 5 don't have deployment depths defined in asset management.

By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

GP02HYPM
Deployment: 2
6/16/14, 2:15 AM 6/22/14, 12:00 PM

Excluding data from the beginning of deployment 2 from the final statistics as the mooring was recovered and re-deployed (annotation ID 580)

By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

GP02HYPM
Deployment: 5
7/15/17, 9:25 PM 7/26/18, 10:15 PM

The mooring was deployed 9 - 10 km from the location of the previous 4 deployments of this mooring. If this location is correct, the platform should be annotated to inform the users as to why the deployment location changed.

By Lori Garzio, on 1/2/19

New Note

Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
GP02HYPM
6/20/14, 11:28 PM 6/21/14, 10:14 PM

Deployment 2: Platform was deployed on 6/16/2014, recovered on 6/21/2014 at 03:28 UTC due to firmware issue and re-deployed with updated firmware on 6/22/2014 at 02:14 UTC

Id: 580 By: lgarzio
Flag: not_operational Exclude: No

GP02HYPM-WFP02
1/10/17, 5:47 AM 7/16/17, 11:20 AM

Deployment 4: Profiler failed.

Id: 716 By: lgarzio
Flag: not_operational Exclude: No

GP02HYPM
7/15/17, 5:25 PM 7/26/18, 6:15 PM

Deployment 5: Telemetered data are not available for this deployment because gliders were not deployed.

Id: 140 By: lgarzio

GP02HYPM-WFP02
9/25/19, 8:00 PM

Deployment 7: No telemetered data are expected from any instruments on the upper WFP after 2019-09-26. These data should be avaible upon recovery.

Id: 2017 By: cdobson

GP02HYPM-WFP02
12/31/19, 7:00 PM

Deployment 7: Due to a clock rollover issue, all WFPs have ceased sampling on 1/1/2020. No WFP data are being collected after this date. A resolution is being researched by the vendor.

Id: 1886 By: cdobson