Profiler Controller

Reference Designator
GP02HYPM-WFP03-00-WFPENG000
Start Depth
2,100
End Depth
4,038
Location
Current Status
Engineering
Class
WFPEN (Profiler Controller)
Series
WFPEN-G
Science Discipline
Make
McLane
Model
MMP
M2M Example
https://ooinet.oceanobservatories.org/api/m2m/12576/sensor/inv/GP02HYPM/WFP03/00-WFPENG000/metadata
Method Data Stream Content Type
recovered_wfp wfp_eng_stc_imodem_engineering_recovered Engineering Data Report M2M Engineering
recovered_wfp wfp_eng_stc_imodem_start_time_recovered Start Time Data Report M2M Engineering
recovered_wfp wfp_eng_stc_imodem_status_recovered Status Data Report M2M Engineering
telemetered wfp_eng_wfp_sio_mule_engineering Engineering Data Report M2M Engineering
telemetered wfp_eng_wfp_sio_mule_start_time Start Time Data Report M2M Engineering
telemetered wfp_eng_wfp_sio_mule_status Status Data Report M2M Engineering
Deployment Cruise Start Date Stop Date Mooring Asset Node Asset Sensor Asset Latitude Longitude Deployment Depth Water Depth
1 Review MV1309 07/26/2013 06/14/2014 CGMGP-02HYPM-00001 CGVEH-GWFPGX-77401 CGCON-GWFPGX-77401 50.0707 -144.798 4061 4219
2 Review MV1404 06/22/2014 06/02/2015 CGMGP-02HYPM-00002 CGVEH-GWFPGX-10402 CGCON-GWFPGX-10402 50.0783 -144.805 4038 4219
3 Review TN323 06/04/2015 07/01/2016 CGMGP-02HYPM-00003 CGVEH-GWFPGX-10403 CGCON-GWFPGX-10403 50.0798 -144.803 4070 4219
4 Review RB1605 07/03/2016 07/16/2017 CGMGP-02HYPM-00004 CGVEH-GWFPGX-93602 CGCON-GWFPGX-93602 50.0796 -144.806 4062 4220
5 Review SR1710 07/15/2017 07/26/2018 CGMGP-02HYPM-00005 CGVEH-GWFPGX-10403 CGCON-GWFPGX-10403 50.1156 -144.918 4063 4230
6 Review SR1811 07/22/2018 09/26/2019 CGMGP-02HYPM-00006 CGVEH-GWFPGX-93602 CGCON-GWFPGX-93602 50.0686 -144.798 4063 4222
7 Review SKQ201920S 09/26/2019 CGMGP-02HYPM-00007 CGVEH-GWFPGX-10403 CGCON-GWFPGX-10403 50.1152 -144.916 4063 4237
Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
GP02HYPM

I submitted a helpdesk question on 11/12/2018 regarding an offset between recovered and telemetered data for all global HYPMs: "There appears to be a substantial offset between data with the same timestamps from recovered_wfp and telemetered methods for all deployments of all global WFP CTDs, and I have included information from two representative deployments of two different profilers as examples. It looks like the values recorded for the first common timestamp are exactly the same, and as the profiler moves along in time the offset between the values recorded for the same timestamp become increasingly more offset. Then, the profiler reaches the end of the profile (either at its shallowest or deepest point), resets, and the pattern begins again. This is most easily seen in the pressure data, but there is an offset for all science parameters.

Examples:
GI02HYPM-WFP02-04-CTDPFL000 deployment 1
GP02HYPM-WFP02-04-CTDPFL000 deployment 3

The *_intersect.csv files attached contain data where recovered and telemetered timestamps intersect. For each timestamp and science parameter there are recorded values (from .nc files downloaded from the system) and the difference. For each parameter, the difference between the values at the bottom and top of the profiler's range are exactly zero, and (particularly for pressure) the differences steadily increase until they are reset at zero at the bottom/top of the profile. This pattern continues throughout the deployment. The plots attached are zoomed in to one upcast and one downcast, and highlight the offset in the data between the two methods."

Redmine 13743

By Lori Garzio, on 8/8/19

GP02HYPM
7/3/16, 2:05 AM 7/26/18, 10:15 PM

Deployments 4 and 5 don't have deployment depths defined in asset management.

By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

GP02HYPM
Deployment: 2
6/16/14, 2:15 AM 6/22/14, 12:00 PM

Excluding data from the beginning of deployment 2 from the final statistics as the mooring was recovered and re-deployed (annotation ID 580)

By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

GP02HYPM
Deployment: 5
7/15/17, 9:25 PM 7/26/18, 10:15 PM

The mooring was deployed 9 - 10 km from the location of the previous 4 deployments of this mooring. If this location is correct, the platform should be annotated to inform the users as to why the deployment location changed.

By Lori Garzio, on 1/2/19

New Note

Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
GP02HYPM
6/20/14, 11:28 PM 6/21/14, 10:14 PM

Deployment 2: Platform was deployed on 6/16/2014, recovered on 6/21/2014 at 03:28 UTC due to firmware issue and re-deployed with updated firmware on 6/22/2014 at 02:14 UTC

Id: 580 By: lgarzio
Flag: not_operational Exclude: No

GP02HYPM-WFP03
4/5/15, 1:46 AM 6/1/15, 8:00 PM

Deployment 2: Profiler failed due to depleted battery.

Id: 715 By: lgarzio

GP02HYPM
7/15/17, 5:25 PM 7/26/18, 6:15 PM

Deployment 5: Telemetered data are not available for this deployment because gliders were not deployed.

Id: 140 By: lgarzio

GP02HYPM-WFP03
12/31/19, 7:00 PM

Deployment 7: Due to a clock rollover issue, all WFPs have ceased sampling on 1/1/2020. No WFP data are being collected after this date. A resolution is being researched by the vendor.

Id: 1887 By: cdobson