CTD

Reference Designator
GS05MOAS-GL560-04-CTDGVM000
Start Depth
0
End Depth
1,000
Location
Current Status
Review Complete
Class
CTDGV (CTD Glider)
Series
CTDGV-M
Science Discipline
Physical
Make
Sea-Bird
Model
SBE Glider Payload CTD (GP-CTD)
M2M Example
https://ooinet.oceanobservatories.org/api/m2m/12576/sensor/inv/GS05MOAS/GL560/04-CTDGVM000/metadata
Method Data Stream Content Type
recovered_host ctdgv_m_glider_instrument_recovered Data Products Report M2M Stats Science
telemetered ctdgv_m_glider_instrument Data Products Report M2M Stats Science
Deployment Cruise Start Date Stop Date Mooring Asset Node Asset Sensor Asset Latitude Longitude Deployment Depth Water Depth
1 Review NBP-15-11 12/20/2015 11/27/2016 CGVGS-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDROO-00560 CGINS-CTDGVM-09269 -54.1248 -89.7766 1000 1000
Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
GS05MOAS

Glider optodes typically exhibit a sensor lag of 20-25 seconds. Example attached of several segments with consecutive down and up casts for CP05MOAS-GL335-04-DOSTAM000 on 10/26/2015 showing a typical measurement time lag. Profiles should be analyzed for individual time lags and data should be adjusted. OOI doesn't necessarily need to make the adjustment but users should be aware of the issue.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/31/19

GS05MOAS-GL560-04-CTDGVM000

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Conductivity and salinity from the glider was lower than salinity from the CTD cast at the surface. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted, which is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/11/19

GS05MOAS-GL560-04-CTDGVM000

99% of sci_seawater_density values are NaNs. Lat and lon are parameters used in the data product algorithm, so I think this got messed up with the re-organization of the glider lat/lon parameters. See Redmine ticket #14486

By Lori Garzio, on 1/24/20

New Note

Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
GS05MOAS-GL560
12/20/15, 2:45 PM 11/22/16, 10:14 AM

Deployment 1: Glider was pushed far north of the Southern Ocean array where it was recovered. At recovery, barnacles were present mostly on the underside of the glider, and were not in an area to hinder flight performance.

Id: 578 By: lgarzio