Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Salinity from the glider was lower than salinity from the CTD cast at the surface. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted, which is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/11/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for R0001. Salinity from the glider was higher than salinity from the CTD cast (the CTD cast was done >6km from the glider location). Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted, which is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/11/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was generally comparable to the CTD cast, with the exception of the chl-a maximum (~25 - 50 dbar) and at deeper depths (>100 dbar) where the glider recorded higher chl-a values. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/11/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was generally comparable to the CTD cast, with the exception of the chl-a maximum (~25 - 50 dbar) and at deeper depths (>100 dbar) where the glider recorded higher chl-a values. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/11/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was generally comparable to the CTD cast, with the exception of the chl-a maximum (~25 - 50 dbar) where the glider recorded higher chl-a values. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/11/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was generally comparable to the CTD cast, with the exception of the chl-a maximum (~25 - 50 dbar) where the glider recorded higher chl-a values. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/11/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for R0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was higher compared to the CTD cast. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/11/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001, D0002, and R0001. Chl-a recorded by the profiler was higher compared to the CTD cast for all 3 comparisons. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001 and D0002. Chl-a recorded by the profiler was higher compared to the CTD cast for D0002. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001, D0002, and R0001. D0001: the profiler's salinity is lower than the shipboard CTD cast. D0002 and R0001: the profiler's conductivity and salinity are lower than the shipboard CTD cast. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001 and D0002. Conductivity, salinity, and density from the profiler are lower than the shipboard CTD cast for D0001. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for R0001 (the majority of the Papa cruise data are not available in Alfresco). The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between profiler and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for R0001 (the majority of the Papa cruise data are not available in Alfresco). The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between profiler and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast (although there was a much wider range of salinity values from the glider at the surface). Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Salinity from the glider was lower than salinity from the CTD cast. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted, which is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Salinity from the glider was higher than salinity from the CTD cast. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted, which is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0002. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0002. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast (although there was a much wider range of salinity values from the glider at the surface). Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with the shipboard CTD casts were done for D0002 and D0003. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast (although there was a much wider range of salinity values from the glider at the surface for D0002). Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19