Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001, D0002, and R0001. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between profiler and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. The available science parameter values and patterns are comparable between the glider and CTD cast, however further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

recovered_host pressure record in the data file is a constant value of 93.8 dbar.
The recovered_host CTD file in the DO folder are reporting one value: see (https://opendap.oceanobservatories.org/thredds/dodsC/ooi/lgarzio@marine.rutgers.edu/20181212T235659-CP03ISSM-MFD37-04-DOSTAD000-recovered_host-dosta_abcdjm_dcl_instrument_recovered/deployment0002_CP03ISSM-MFD37-03-CTDBPD000-recovered_host-ctdbp_cdef_dcl_instrument_recovered_20150509T010502.785000-20150509T010502.785000.nc.ascii?pressure[0:1:0])

This is in agreement with what the CTD file in the CTD folder are reporting: see (https://opendap.oceanobservatories.org/thredds/dodsC/ooi/lgarzio@marine.rutgers.edu/20181212T235133-CP03ISSM-MFD37-03-CTDBPD000-recovered_host-ctdbp_cdef_dcl_instrument_recovered/deployment0002_CP03ISSM-MFD37-03-CTDBPD000-recovered_host-ctdbp_cdef_dcl_instrument_recovered_20150509T010502.785000-20150509T010502.785000.nc.ascii?pressure[0:1:0])

Telemetered data are also missing.

There are data in the recovered_inst CTD folder see: (https://opendap.oceanobservatories.org/thredds/dodsC/ooi/lgarzio@marine.rutgers.edu/20181212T235146-CP03ISSM-MFD37-03-CTDBPD000-recovered_inst-ctdbp_cdef_instrument_recovered/deployment0002_CP03ISSM-MFD37-03-CTDBPD000-recovered_inst-ctdbp_cdef_instrument_recovered_20150509T010501-20151021T183501.nc.ascii?ctdbp_seawater_pressure[0:1:15839])

By Leila Belabbassi, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was comparable to the CTD cast near the surface, and slightly higher compared to the CTD cast at depth (>100 dbar). Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was higher compared to the CTD cast. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0002. Chl-a recorded by the glider was comparable to the CTD cast near the surface, lower at the chl-a maximum, and higher depth (>100 dbar). Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0002. Chl-a recorded by the glider was comparable to the CTD cast near the surface, and higher compared to the CTD cast at depth (>100 dbar). Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0002 and D0003. Chl-a recorded by the glider was higher compared to the CTD casts. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was higher compared to the CTD cast. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was higher compared to the CTD cast. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001, D0002, D0003, D0004 and R0004. For each comparison, salinity from the profiler was lower than salinity from the CTD cast (D0002 difference more pronounced at depth. R0004 difference more pronounced closer to the surface). For D0004, conductivity was also lower for the profiler compared to the CTD cast. Comparison to the shipboard bottle data is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001, D0002, D0003, D0004 and R0004. When data were available for both, they generally encompassed the same data ranges. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was higher compared to the CTD cast at the surface, and generally matched the CTD cast at depth (~50-100 dbar). Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparison with the shipboard CTD cast was done for D0001. Chl-a recorded by the glider was variable from 0-50 dbar, generally matched the CTD cast data from 50-90 dbar, and was higher than the CTD cast from 90-110 dbar. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001, D0002, and R0001. Chl-a recorded by the profiler was higher compared to the CTD cast for D0001 and D0002. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19

Comparisons with shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001, D0002, and R0001. Chl-a recorded by the profiler was higher compared to the CTD cast for D0002. Further analysis using the shipboard bottle data should be conducted. This is outside the scope of this project.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/8/19