Notes

Sort by:
  • Reference Designator
  • First Name
  • Created  
  • Modified
  • Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
    GI03FLMB-RIM01-02-CTDMOG065
    Deployment: 4
    11/10/17, 8:00 PM 11/12/17, 12:00 AM

    Salinity and density dropped for approx. 24 hours, then returned to reasonable values. Excluding data from final statistics.

    By Lori Garzio, on 12/19/18

    GI03FLMB-RIM01-02-CTDMOG068
    Deployment: 2
    8/21/15, 5:11 PM 7/18/16, 12:00 AM

    Salinity for deployment 2 appears to be shifted low compared to other deployments. The average salinity for deployment 2 is 34.88 while the average salinity for deployments 1, 3, 4 is 34.90. This pattern isn't observed in surrounding CTDMOs.

    By Lori Garzio, on 12/19/18

    GI03FLMB-RIM01-02-CTDMOH069
    Deployment: 4
    8/7/17, 3:49 PM 6/11/18, 7:36 PM

    Need an annotation explaining to the user why deployment 4 recovered_inst data are not available. According to the ingest csv, recovered_inst data are not expected because: "could not communicate with instrument".

    By Lori Garzio, on 12/19/18

    GI03FLMB-RIM01-02-CTDMOH070
    Deployment: 4
    8/7/17, 3:49 PM 6/11/18, 7:36 PM

    Density and salinity start low and gradually increase before leveling off. This pattern isn't observed in surrounding CTDMOs, or in the previous deployments of this CTDMO. Excluding data from final statistics, and issue should be investigated and annotated.

    By Lori Garzio, on 12/19/18

    GI03FLMB-RIM01-02-CTDMOH070
    Deployment: 1
    3/5/15, 12:00 PM 3/6/15, 12:00 PM

    Conductivity (and salinity and density) dropped suddenly for approx. 24 hours, then returned to reasonable values. Excluding data from final statistics.

    By Lori Garzio, on 12/19/18

    GI03FLMA-RI000-00-CTDMOH400
    Deployment: 2
    10/2/15, 12:00 AM 10/2/15, 12:00 PM

    Practical salinity and density dropped briefly - excluding from final statistics.

    By Lori Garzio, on 12/21/18

    GI03FLMB-RI000-00-CTDMOH000
    Deployment: 2
    8/21/15, 5:11 PM 7/18/16, 12:00 AM

    Salinity for deployment 2 appears to be shifted high compared to other deployments. The average salinity for deployment 2 is 34.94 while the average salinity for deployments 1, 3, 4 is 34.93. This pattern isn't observed in surrounding CTDMOs.

    By Lori Garzio, on 12/21/18

    GI02HYPM-RIM01-02-CTDMOG039
    8/16/15, 10:59 PM 6/16/18, 6:32 AM

    Deployments 2, 3, 4: deployment depths from asset management are substantially different than the pressure recorded by the instrument. If the deployment depths in asset management are correct, the data should be annotated to indicate why the pressure values are so different from the depth at which the instrument was deployed.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/2/19

    GP02HYPM
    Deployment: 5
    7/15/17, 9:25 PM 7/26/18, 10:15 PM

    The mooring was deployed 9 - 10 km from the location of the previous 4 deployments of this mooring. If this location is correct, the platform should be annotated to inform the users as to why the deployment location changed.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/2/19

    GP02HYPM-RIM01-02-CTDMOG039
    Deployment: 1
    7/26/13, 8:11 AM 6/14/14, 12:00 AM

    Data are unreasonable. According to asset management, the instrument was deployed at 150m but pressure values are recorded around 280 dbar. Conductivity, salinity, and density are also unreasonable. Temperature in degrees Celsius appear to be reasonable for a CTD deployed at 280 dbar. The L0 data products (conductivity, pressure and temperature in counts) are in a similar range to those from other deployments.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/2/19

    GP02HYPM
    7/3/16, 2:05 AM 7/26/18, 10:15 PM

    Deployments 4 and 5 don't have deployment depths defined in asset management.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

    GP03FLMA
    7/1/16, 1:07 AM 7/27/18, 10:14 PM

    Deployments 4 and 5 don't have deployment depths defined in asset management.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

    GP03FLMB
    7/4/16, 11:07 PM 7/25/18, 5:11 PM

    Deployments 4 and 5 don't have deployment depths defined in asset management.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

    GP02HYPM
    Deployment: 2
    6/16/14, 2:15 AM 6/22/14, 12:00 PM

    Excluding data from the beginning of deployment 2 from the final statistics as the mooring was recovered and re-deployed (annotation ID 580)

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

    GP02HYPM-RIM01-02-CTDMOG039
    Deployment: 3
    6/29/15, 12:00 AM 7/17/15, 12:00 AM

    Conductivity dropped substantially for several weeks (this affects salinity and density). Temperature and pressure don't appear to be affected. Excluding data from final statistics. Data should be annotated to alert users of the issue.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

    GP02HYPM-RIM01-02-CTDMOG039
    Deployment: 4
    8/27/16, 12:00 AM 10/23/16, 12:00 AM

    Conductivity dropped substantially (this affects salinity and density) then gradually returned to resemble the data that were recorded before the issue. Temperature and pressure don't appear to be affected. Excluding data from final statistics. Data should be annotated to alert users of the issue.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

    GP02HYPM-RIM01-02-CTDMOG039
    Deployment: 4
    3/10/17, 12:00 PM 3/12/17, 12:00 AM

    Conductivity (and salinity and density) dropped suddenly for approx. 24 hours, then returned to reasonable values. Excluding data from final statistics.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

    GP02HYPM-RIM01-02-CTDMOG039
    Deployment: 5
    4/23/18, 12:00 PM 4/25/18, 12:00 AM

    Conductivity (and salinity and density) dropped suddenly for several hours, then returned to reasonable values. Excluding data from final statistics.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

    GA02HYPM
    Deployment: 2
    5/23/16, 12:00 AM 11/5/16, 12:00 AM

    Modify annotation ID 130 to indicate the time the mooring fell. According to the pressure data from the CTDMO, the mooring began to fall around 5/23/2016. Excluding data from final statistics.

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/3/19

    GP03FLMA-RIM01-02-CTDMOG040
    Deployment: 2
    6/17/14, 6:00 AM 6/5/15, 12:00 AM

    recovered_inst data are not available for download from uFrame. There is an entry in the ingest csv indicating that the raw data file is available. This should be investigated and the recovered_inst data should be made available for download (or the system should have an annotation indicating why the recovered_inst data are not available).

    By Lori Garzio, on 1/4/19

    4 of 135