3-Wavelength Fluorometer

Reference Designator
CE05MOAS-GL311-02-FLORTM000
Review Status
Review Complete
Note
Depth
0 to 1,000m
Class
FLORT (3-Wavelength Fluorometer)
Make / Model
WET Labs / ECO Puck FLBBCD-SLK

Dataset Reviews Last processed: 5/7/19, 5:21 PM

QC Check Info
Dep. Preferred Method Stream DD FD SG EG Gaps GD TS Rate (s) Pressure Comp. Time Order Valid Data Missing Data Data Comp. Missing Coords. Review
1 recovered_host flort_m_sample 62 61 0 0 0 0 2,982,901 1 200 / 195 Complete
2 recovered_host flort_m_sample 69 52 0 16 0 0 1,595,194 1 200 / 195 Complete
3 recovered_host flort_m_sample 88 76 0 11 0 0 2,723,360 1 200 / 196 Complete
4 recovered_host flort_m_sample 75 75 0 0 0 0 2,989,075 1 200 / 201 Complete
5 recovered_host flort_m_sample 4 3 0 0 0 0 88,603 1 200 / 139 Complete
6 recovered_host flort_m_sample 23 18 0 0 1 5 669,992 1 1000 / 995 Complete
Data Ranges Review Images

Test Notes

All good!

Data Coverage

Deployment: 123456
flort_m_sample 98%75%86%100%75%78%

Deployment Map

System Annotations

No annotations yet.

Review Notes

Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
CE05MOAS

Bad altimeter pings are apparent in many deployments of the coastal gliders. A few example plots are attached - m_water_depth plotted as semi-transparent bathymetry.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/10/19

CE05MOAS-GL311

Data look suspect for several different time points and deployments for this glider. For example, zoomed in plots from 11/12/2014 - 11/14/2014 show what looks to be a time lag in the dissolved oxygen data? The glider not going to the surface shows up in the overall deployment 1 graph as a band around 50 dbar.

The deployment 4 overall graph has a similar banding feature around 5 dbar. Zoomed in plots from 10/1/2017 - 10/3/2017 depicts very high DO concentrations at the surface on the first downcast. The corresponding temperature data from the CTD has a lower temperature value at the very beginning of each downcast (easily seen in the profile and xsection plots attached).

Similar features are seen in other deployments of other gliders, but these were the most pronounced examples I have seen so far. Some possible issues could be a time lag, biofouling, sensor failure, etc.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/13/19

CE05MOAS

Glider optodes typically exhibit a sensor lag of 20-25 seconds. Example attached of 3 consecutive down and up casts for CE05MOAS-GL312-04-DOSTAM000 on 7/8/2014 showing a typical measurement time lag. Profiles should be analyzed for individual time lags and data should be adjusted. OOI doesn't necessarily need to make the adjustment but users should be aware of the issue.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/14/19

CE05MOAS-GL311-02-FLORTM000
Deployment: 1

Suspect data after 11/10/2014

By Lori Garzio, on 5/13/19

CE05MOAS-GL311
Deployment: 2

It looks like the glider deviated from the mission. Dataset should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/10/19

CE05MOAS-GL311
Deployment: 5

Short deployment (4 days) should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/9/19

CE05MOAS-GL311
Deployment: 6

Sampling pattern changed on 5/14/2018. This should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/13/19

New Note