3-Wavelength Fluorometer

Reference Designator
CE05MOAS-GL311-02-FLORTM000
Start Depth
0
End Depth
1,000
Location
Current Status
Review Complete
Class
FLORT (3-Wavelength Fluorometer)
Series
FLORT-M
Science Discipline
Biological
Make
WET Labs
Model
ECO Puck FLBBCD-SLK
M2M Example
https://ooinet.oceanobservatories.org/api/m2m/12576/sensor/inv/CE05MOAS/GL311/02-FLORTM000/metadata
Method Data Stream Content Type
recovered_host flort_m_sample Data Products Report M2M Stats Science
telemetered flort_m_sample Data Products Report M2M Stats Science
Deployment Cruise Start Date Stop Date Mooring Asset Node Asset Sensor Asset Latitude Longitude Deployment Depth Water Depth
1 Review OC1410A 10/06/2014 12/06/2014 CGVCE-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDRCE-00311 CGINS-FLORTM-02760 44.3704 -124.95 200 200
2 Review OC1601 01/22/2016 03/30/2016 CGVCE-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDRCE-00311 CGINS-FLORTM-02760 44.6591 -124.293 200 200
3 Review PS1610A 10/11/2016 01/06/2017 CGVCE-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDRCE-00311 CGINS-FLORTM-04258 44.635 -124.311 200 200
4 Review CE-1707 07/25/2017 10/07/2017 CGVCE-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDRCE-00311 CGINS-FLORTM-03188 47.131 -124.297 200 200
5 Review SKQ201808S 04/01/2018 04/04/2018 CGVCE-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDRCE-00311 CGINS-FLORTM-03188 44.661 -124.141 200 200
6 Review ML201805B 05/10/2018 06/01/2018 CGVCE-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDRCE-00311 CGINS-FLORTM-04195 44.631 -124.303 1000 1000
7 Review OC1905C 05/03/2019 06/13/2019 CGVCE-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDRCE-00311 CGINS-FLORTM-04221 44.637 -124.304 1000 1000
8 Review EK20190703 07/03/2019 09/10/2019 CGVCE-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDRCE-00311 CGINS-FLORTM-04221 44.63 -124.307 1000 1000
9 Review SKQ201921S 10/22/2019 11/21/2019 CGVCE-05MOAS-00000 CGVEH-GLDRCE-00311 CGINS-FLORTM-04221 44.631 -124.298 200 200
Metadata Start Date End Date Comment
CE05MOAS

Bad altimeter pings are apparent in many deployments of the coastal gliders. A few example plots are attached - m_water_depth plotted as semi-transparent bathymetry.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/10/19

CE05MOAS-GL311

Data look suspect for several different time points and deployments for this glider. For example, zoomed in plots from 11/12/2014 - 11/14/2014 show what looks to be a time lag in the dissolved oxygen data? The glider not going to the surface shows up in the overall deployment 1 graph as a band around 50 dbar.

The deployment 4 overall graph has a similar banding feature around 5 dbar. Zoomed in plots from 10/1/2017 - 10/3/2017 depicts very high DO concentrations at the surface on the first downcast. The corresponding temperature data from the CTD has a lower temperature value at the very beginning of each downcast (easily seen in the profile and xsection plots attached).

Similar features are seen in other deployments of other gliders, but these were the most pronounced examples I have seen so far. Some possible issues could be a time lag, biofouling, sensor failure, etc.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/13/19

CE05MOAS

Glider optodes typically exhibit a sensor lag of 20-25 seconds. Example attached of 3 consecutive down and up casts for CE05MOAS-GL312-04-DOSTAM000 on 7/8/2014 showing a typical measurement time lag. Profiles should be analyzed for individual time lags and data should be adjusted. OOI doesn't necessarily need to make the adjustment but users should be aware of the issue.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/14/19

CE05MOAS-GL311-02-FLORTM000
Deployment: 1

Suspect data after 11/10/2014

By Lori Garzio, on 5/13/19

CE05MOAS-GL311
Deployment: 2

It looks like the glider deviated from the mission. Dataset should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/10/19

CE05MOAS-GL311
Deployment: 5

Short deployment (4 days) should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/9/19

CE05MOAS-GL311
Deployment: 6

Sampling pattern changed on 5/14/2018. This should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 5/13/19

New Note

No annotations yet.