There are no data available for download for deployment 1, and only 2 days worth of data for deployment 2. This should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

Annotation ID 181 is a duplicate of 221, with a much shorter time range.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

15% of seawater velocities for deployments 1 and 3 are nans, outside of global ranges, and outliers (+-5SD)

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

100% of the pco2_seawater values are outside of global ranges for deployments 1 and 4 (data aren't available for deployment 2-3) - the global ranges should be updated to be from 200-2000 uatm

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

99% of the pco2_seawater values for this deployment are outside of global ranges - the global ranges should be updated to be from 200-2000 uatm

By Lori Garzio, on 9/25/19

95% of the pco2_seawater values for this deployment are outside of global ranges - the global ranges should be updated to be from 200-2000 uatm

By Lori Garzio, on 9/25/19

83% of the pco2_seawater values for this deployment are outside of global ranges - the global ranges should be updated to be from 200-2000 uatm

By Lori Garzio, on 9/25/19

When I downloaded data for deployments 1-4 for this instrument (pco2w_b_sami_data_record), I don't receive data files for deployments 2 and 3 (there are files for pco2w_b_sami_data_record_cal). This should be investigated and annotated if there is a reason the science data aren't available.

https://opendap.oceanobservatories.org/thredds/catalog/ooi/lgarzio@marine.rutgers.edu/20190923T185736035Z-CE04OSBP-LJ01C-09-PCO2WB104-streamed-pco2w_b_sami_data_record/catalog.html

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

Annotation ID 90 needs to be updated when the cal value review is complete.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

There is no pressure variable in any of the .nc files. This should be a coordinate.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

Suspect data: 40% of beam_attenuation and 57% of optical_absorption values are NaNs, fill values, or outside of global ranges for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

Suspect data: 46% of optical_absorption values are NaNs, fill values, or outside of global ranges for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

The missing data for deployments 2 and 3 should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

There are no data available for download from deployment 1. If there is a reason, the dataset should be annotated to alert users.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

There is no pressure variable in any of the .nc files. This should be a coordinate.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

According to Roesler and Barnard (Optical proxy for phytoplankton biomass in the absence of photophysiology: Rethinking the absorption line height, Methods in Oceanography, 2013), “absorption meters are highly prone to biofouling, particularly biofilms which not only attenuate the collimated beam but also impact the scattering properties of the optical surfaces and tubes. In productive coastal waters biofouling can have significant impacts (i.e. 10% of the signal) within one to two weeks”.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

When plotting the full-resolution dataset, the data ranges for the velocity parameters are outside of global ranges (-3 to 3 m s-1), particularly for deployments 1 and 2.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/14/19

Suspect data - thsph_sulfide and thsph_hydrogen (mmol kg-1) values are almost zero.

By Lori Garzio, on 10/17/19

Suspect data - 59% of thsph_temp_tcl values are outliers or outside of global ranges

By Lori Garzio, on 10/17/19

Values for thsph_ph, thsph_ph_acl, thsph_ph_noref and thsph_ph_noref_acl are all NaNs or fill values. This should be investigated and annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 10/17/19