44% of spkir_downwelling_vector values are outside of global ranges or outliers (+/- 5 SD) for this deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 12/11/19

int_ctd_pressure is negative towards the end of the deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/11/19

The deployment 1 .nc files are missing the 'pressure' coordinate

By Lori Garzio, on 12/11/19

28% of optical_absorption values are NaNs, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/-5 SD) for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/11/19

20% of beam_attenuation and 59% of optical_absorption values are NaNs, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/-5 SD) for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/11/19

11% of beam_attenuation and 31% of optical_absorption values are NaNs, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/-5 SD) for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/11/19

There are no data available for download for deployment 1 - this should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/11/19

According to Roesler and Barnard (Optical proxy for phytoplankton biomass in the absence of photophysiology: Rethinking the absorption line height, Methods in Oceanography, 2013), “absorption meters are highly prone to biofouling, particularly biofilms which not only attenuate the collimated beam but also impact the scattering properties of the optical surfaces and tubes. In productive coastal waters biofouling can have significant impacts (i.e. 10% of the signal) within one to two weeks”.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/11/19

Suspect data at the end of deployment 4.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/10/19

Suspect data: high fluorometric_chlorophyll_a values in July 2016 and at the end of the deployment when the profiler was stuck.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/10/19

int_ctd_pressure is negative towards the end of the deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/10/19

67% of fluorometric_chlorophyll_a values for deployment 1 are outside of global ranges.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/10/19

It looks like the profiler was stuck at the bottom at several points during deployments 1 and 2. This should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/9/19

Annotation IDs 1293, 1298, 1302, 1303, 1305, 1307, 1308, 1310, 1311, 1323, 1324, 1325, 1353, 1330, "Data gap under investigation." should be updated

By Lori Garzio, on 12/6/19

There are no deployment depths in asset management for any of the instruments on the shallow profiler.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/6/19

Suspect data: somewhat regular periods of high variability in fluorometric_cdom, including negative values.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/5/19

36% of optical_backscatter and seawater_scattering_coefficient values for this deployment are fill values

By Lori Garzio, on 12/5/19

39% of optical_backscatter and seawater_scattering_coefficient values for this deployment are fill values

By Lori Garzio, on 12/5/19

38% of optical_backscatter and seawater_scattering_coefficient values for this deployment are fill values, and 66% of fluorometric_chlorophyll_a values are outside of global ranges.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/5/19

50% of optical_backscatter and seawater_scattering_coefficient values for this deployment are fill values, and 97% of fluorometric_chlorophyll_a values are outside of global ranges.

By Lori Garzio, on 12/5/19