52% of velpt_d_upward_velocity values are outside of global ranges for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/22/19

35% of spkir_downwelling_vector values are outside of global ranges for this deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 11/22/19

58% of spkir_downwelling_vector values are outside of global ranges or outliers (+/- 5SD) for this deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 11/22/19

62% of spkir_downwelling_vector values are outside of global ranges or outliers (+/- 5SD) for this deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 11/22/19

18% of optical_absorption values are outside of global ranges or outliers (+/-5SD) for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/21/19

32% of optical_absorption values are NaNs, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/-5SD) for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/21/19

27% of beam_attenuation and 33% of optical_absorption values are NaNs, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/-5SD) for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/21/19

According to Roesler and Barnard (Optical proxy for phytoplankton biomass in the absence of photophysiology: Rethinking the absorption line height, Methods in Oceanography, 2013), “absorption meters are highly prone to biofouling, particularly biofilms which not only attenuate the collimated beam but also impact the scattering properties of the optical surfaces and tubes. In productive coastal waters biofouling can have significant impacts (i.e. 10% of the signal) within one to two weeks”.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/21/19

wavelength_a, wavelength_c, beam_attenuation and optical_absorption are all fill values for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/21/19

Annotation ID 1287 should be updated - it says an investigation is currently in process and the date of the annotation is 2017.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/21/19

There are no deployment depths in asset management for any of the instruments on the shallow profiler.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/21/19

Missing data for deployment 1 should be annotated

By Lori Garzio, on 11/21/19

65% of spkir_downwelling_vector values are outside of global ranges for this deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

50% of spkir_downwelling_vector values are outside of global ranges for this deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

80% of spkir_downwelling_vector values are outside of global ranges for this deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

Missing data for the second half of this deployment should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

There are no data available for download for deployment 1 - this should be annotated.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

26% of beam_attenuation and 55% of optical_absorption values are NaNs, outside of global ranges, or outliers (+/-5SD) for this deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

According to Roesler and Barnard (Optical proxy for phytoplankton biomass in the absence of photophysiology: Rethinking the absorption line height, Methods in Oceanography, 2013), “absorption meters are highly prone to biofouling, particularly biofilms which not only attenuate the collimated beam but also impact the scattering properties of the optical surfaces and tubes. In productive coastal waters biofouling can have significant impacts (i.e. 10% of the signal) within one to two weeks”.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19

There are no deployment depths in asset management for any of the instruments on the shallow profiler.

By Lori Garzio, on 11/19/19