The pressure coordinate (pressure_depth) is an array of all fill values. This variable should contain valid pressure data. There is another variable in the files called in_ctd_pressure that contains what appears to be valid pressure data. This is the case for every FLORTK on every WFP. https://opendap.oceanobservatories.org/thredds/dodsC/ooi/lgarzio@marine.rutgers.edu/20181218T161008-CP04OSPM-WFP01-04-FLORTK000-recovered_wfp-flort_sample/deployment0008_CP04OSPM-WFP01-04-FLORTK000-recovered_wfp-flort_sample_20171110T050202-20180103T093004.nc.ascii?pressure_depth[0:1:1000],int_ctd_pressure[0:1:1000]

By Lori Garzio, on 3/12/19

Comparisons with the shipboard CTD casts were done for D0001, R0001, D0002, R0002, D0003, R0003, D0004, R0004, D0005, R0005, D0006, D0007, R0007, D0008. Chl-a recorded by the profiler was slightly higher at deployment compared to the CTD cast, particularly at the chl-a maximum (with the exception of D0003), and often substantially higher compared to the CTD cast at recovery. Profiler values for R0004 are unreasonable.

By Lori Garzio, on 3/13/19

Deployment 5: suspect data at 0 dbar at the very end of the deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 8/26/19

Suspect data at the end of the deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 8/26/19

Suspect data

By Lori Garzio, on 8/26/19

Suspect data during the second half of the deployment.

By Lori Garzio, on 8/26/19

Suspect data

By Lori Garzio, on 8/26/19

Suspect data towards the end of the deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 8/26/19

55% of fluorometric_chlorophyll_a values are negative for this deployment

By Lori Garzio, on 8/26/19